Medicaid |
CHIP
Medicaid
Integrated Care Management
Last summer, HHSC announced its intent to restructure the Medicaid
delivery system. The proposal recommended:
- Eliminating the popular Primary Care Case management (PCCM)
model in existing communities;
- Expanding the STAR+PLUS HMO model for the elderly and
patients with disabilities to all urban areas of the state;
and
- Expanding Medicaid HMOs to Nueces and surrounding
counties.
If implemented, the proposal meant the majority of Texas'
Medicaid patients would have access only to HMOs. HHSC based its
decision on a provision in HB 2292, adopted in 2003, requiring the
state to implement the "most cost-effective" Medicaid delivery
system. TMA and other organizations vigorously protested the
state's decision, arguing it was made on dubious and flawed
assumptions.
Two months before the start of session, Dallas Medical Resource,
a group of business and health care leaders, released a study
finding that an HMO-only model would jeopardize public hospitals'
ability to capture at least $150 million in federal "Upper Payment
Limit" (UPL) dollars, which are used today to subsidize Medicaid
and local indigent care programs. Without access to the federal
funds, urban hospital districts, straining from rising numbers of
uninsured and lower reimbursements, would have little choice but to
increase local taxes, cut community services, or both.
The new findings galvanized an informal coalition of business,
health care, and county leaders, who united anew to fight HHSC's
HMO-only proposal. Most important, the data sparked considerable
concern among legislators who worried about the tax and health care
access implications back home.
The coalition advanced on three fronts: developing grassroots
support via the media and outreach from stakeholders; challenging
budget assumptions regarding the fiscal impact of HMOs; and
developing a new approach to Medicaid managed care - Integrated
Care Management (ICM), a model based on TMA's enhanced PCCM.
At battles' end, TMA and its partners achieved qualified
success. HHSC cannot expand the STAR+PLUS HMO model statewide.
Instead, ICM will be piloted in Dallas for the aged, blind, and
disabled population. ICM also is a potential option in other urban
communities, if selected by county and hospital district
leaders.
For pregnant women and children, 70 percent of the total
Medicaid population, HHSC succeeded in stripping the bill of
language to replace PCCM with ICM. Without statutory protection,
HHSC intends to proceed with repealing PCCM in existing areas,
thereby establishing an HMO-only approach for the majority of Texas
Medicaid enrollees.
All the legislative delegations from the affected urban areas
rose to the challenge of questioning the HHSC plan and supporting a
model that would protect their local taxpayers by preserving
federal UPL dollars. HB 1771 had overwhelming support in both
chambers. Notable leaders included Rep. Dianne Delisi (R-Temple),
and Sen. Jane Nelson (R-Lewisville), author and sponsor
(respectively) of the ICM legislation; Reps. Garnet Coleman
(D-Houston), Vilma Luna (D-Corpus Christi), Jim McReynolds
(D-Lufkin), and Vicki Truitt (R-Keller); Sens. Bob Deuell
(R-Greenville), Kyle Janek (R-Houston), Jon Lindsay (R-Houston),
Royce West (D-Dallas), and Judith Zaffirini (D-Laredo), author of
the ICM budget rider.
ICM Legislation
HB 1771 by Representative Delisi and Senator Nelson establishes
a new, noncapitated Medicaid managed care delivery system known as
the ICM model. The bill itself establishes the critical features of
the model, including:
- Assignment of a medical home;
- Utilization and prescription drug management;
- Disease management;
- Health data reporting to physicians and providers;
- Health risk and functional needs assessments to match
patients with services they need, such as case and disease
management;
- Efforts to delay institutionalization of elderly patients and
patient with disabilities; and
- Coordination between acute care and long-term social support
services, such as home health or attendant care.
The bill also allows HHSC to require an upfront savings from any
ICM administrator. Additionally, HHSC must establish an ICM
advisory committee consisting of physicians, hospitals, long-term
care providers, and consumer advocates to assist with the
establishment of the model. HHSC named the advisory council in June
2005. Two TMA appointees will represent medicine.
The adopted bill is a slimmed-down version of the bill as filed.
Provisions of the bill that were removed include: 1) prohibiting
HMO expansion entirely, 2) requiring that PCCM be replaced by ICM
to assure patients and physicians retained a choice of a
noncapitated delivery system, and 3) specifying more detailed roles
and responsibilities of the ICM contractors.
Without statutory protection for PCCM, HHSC intends to proceed
with repealing the model in 2006 from existing urban service areas.
PCCM expansion to rural and border counties in September 2005 is
not affected by HB 1771 or the budget rider.
ICM - Rider 49-HHSC
A companion budget rider to HB 1771 directs HHSC to pilot ICM in
Dallas for the elderly and patients with disabilities (known
officially as the "aged, blind, and disabled," or ABD,
populations). In other service areas, HHSC must consult county
officials and hospital districts in determining which model(s) to
implement for these populations. Options include PCCM, ICM, or an
"HMO carve-out." The carve-out would exclude public hospitals from
HMO capitated payments to preserve access to UPL dollars, but
retain other services, including physician services, in the
HMO.
No state has implemented a carve-out model, and it is not clear
the model will win federal approval. HHSC will submit a
federal waiver requesting approval for the carve-out approach. In
Harris County, where STAR+PLUS HMOs already exist, the rider
directs HHSC to implement the carve-out model if federal approval
is granted.
The budget bill assumes $109.5 in savings from enrolling the ABD
populations in some form of managed care. HHSC will apportion the
savings among the urban service delivery areas. PCCM can only be
used for the ABD populations if actuarial data demonstrate the
model can achieve the savings or via a combination of savings and
provider rate cuts.
|
Pregnant Women, Children, Low-Income
Parents
|
Bexar
|
Dallas
|
El Paso
|
Harris
|
Galveston
|
Lubbock
|
Nueces
|
Travis
|
Tarrant
|
PCCM
|
X
1
|
X
1
|
X
1
|
X
1
|
X
1
|
X
1
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
X
1
|
HMO
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
2
|
X
|
X
|
|
Aged, Blind and Disabled Populations
|
PCCM
|
O
|
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
ICM
|
O
|
X
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
HMO
|
O
|
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
O
|
Carve
|
Out
|
X: In place
X1: Slated for repeal by HHSC in summer 2006.
X2: To be implemented in 2006
O: Options for ABD populations; HHSC must consult county and
hospital district officials in determining which model(s) to
implement in each region. New model will be implemented in late
2006 or early 2007.
Governor's Medicaid Workgroup Reform/Omnibus Medicaid Bill
SB 1188 by Senator Nelson and Representative Delisi represents the
work of the Governor's Medicaid Workgroup. The governor convened
the workgroup during the interim to identify mechanisms to increase
Medicaid efficiency, improve patient care, and lower costs.
Physicians, hospital administrators, and other interested
stakeholders served on the panel. In the last days of the
legislative session, many Medicaid-related bills, including HB
1771, were added to SB 1188 as time grew short.
Much of the bill directs HHSC to implement changes "if possible"
or to examine whether a reform is feasible rather than giving
definitive direction. HHSC must submit a report to the governor and
presiding officers of standing oversight committees by Dec. 1,
2005, regarding the strategies it will use to implement the SB 1188
reforms, or whether a provision is not feasible and another
strategy should be pursued.
Provisions of SB 1188 that are of particular importance to
medicine include:
- Evaluate the case management fee within PCCM and make
recommendations to the Legislative Budget Board if the commission
finds that a different rate is appropriate. The study will
examine the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a sliding-scale
fee based on physician or provider performance.
- Require Medicaid health plans to develop, implement, and
maintain a system for tracking and resolving all provider appeals
related to claims payment.
- Enact a patient, physician, and provider education campaign
to promote cost-effective care, the importance of using a medical
home, and ways to reduce use of emergency departments for
non-emergency needs.
- Direct HHSC to develop a proposal to provide higher
reimbursements for PCCM physicians and providers who treat
patients with chronic health conditions.
- Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of expanding disease
management to include additional diseases.
- Require Internet postings of managed care plans sanctioned
for failure to comply with contractual obligations.
- Require Medicaid managed care organization (MCOs) to use
advanced practice nurses in addition to physicians to serve as
primary care providers in order to increase availability of
primary care services.
- Establish a system to review patient prescription drug usage,
and educate physicians and other providers about that usage, how
to reduce inappropriate use, and possible adverse drug
interactions.
- Establish payment for online medical consultations as a means
to reduce Medicaid costs, pursuant to approval from the federal
government and development of approved CPT codes. HHSC may
develop the online consultation program as a pilot.
- Prohibit Medicaid from paying for erectile dysfunction drugs
for registered sex offenders.
- Direct HHSC to conduct a study of polypharmacy (multiple-drug
use) for Medicaid patients receiving long-term care
services.
- Require physicians participating in CHIP to inform a pregnant
woman of the health benefits she or her child may be eligible for
under the program.
- Require HHSC or its agent to provide written, public
disclosure by drug class of the specific drugs the Pharmaceutical
and Therapeutics Committee recommends be listed as preferred on
the Medicaid preferred drug list (PDL).
- Require Medicaid managed care plans and disease management
vendors to coordinate transition of patients moving from one
program to another.
Other reforms, to be studied or implemented if feasible:
- Allow HHSC to develop reimbursement and related rules for
group appointments with Medicaid patients with certain diseases
or medical conditions.
- Require HHSC to reduce paperwork and administrative burdens
on patients, physicians, and providers. Simplification measures
include:
- Utilize electronic claims,
- Develop an Internet portal for prior authorization
requests,
- Place the Medicaid provider application on the Internet and
encourage providers to submit it electronically, and
- Promote use of electronic prescribing tools and computer
order entry systems.
- Direct HHSC to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a
physician-triage telephone line and to implement a pilot program
in at least two urban service areas if the state can demonstrate
net cost savings.
- Allow HHSC to enter into an agreement with a pharmaceutical
manufacturer to develop a pilot electronic medical records system
in lieu of providing supplemental drug rebates.
- Direct HHSC to improve the delivery of services within
Medicaid managed care organizations by taking the following
actions, if cost-effective:
- Require managed care plans to work with the state and other
stakeholders to improve immunization rates of Medicaid
patients;
- Allow MCOs to access previous claims history of new
enrollees previously enrolled in traditional Medicaid or
PCCM;
- Encourage MCOs to operate nurse-triage telephone lines and
to promote those lines to enrollees, ensuring children
have clinically appropriate alternatives to emergency rooms
outside of regular office hours; and
- Develop effective mechanisms to identify and control
utilization of services by enrollees with high or abusive
utilization patterns.
- Allow HHSC to adopt payment for appropriate nursing services
provided to high-risk or high-cost patients if those services are
a more effective alternative to hospitalization and a physician
certifies the medical appropriateness of the nursing
services.
- Direct HHSC to explore authority under federal law of
providing a stipend payment from Medicaid to cover the cost of a
patient's private health insurance plan as an alternative to
providing Medicaid coverage, including assistance with purchase
of long-term care insurance.
- Require HHSC to evaluate the impact of the
implementation of Medicare Part D on the Medicaid PDL and to
disclose to pharmaceutical manufacturers any clinical edits to be
implemented as part of the PDL before a supplemental rebate
agreement is executed.
PCCM Quality Improvement Pilot Project
SB 1, Article II, HHSC Rider 55 directs HHSC to establish a pilot
in one of the remaining PCCM service areas to test mechanisms that
reduce non-emergent emergency room usage, including higher payment
to primary care physicians and providers who offer after-hours
care, case management services for patients who frequently rely on
the ER for routine care, or other mechanisms HHSC develops. HHSC
must submit a work plan for the pilot to the governor and
Legislative Budget Board by Sept. 1, 2005. No new funds were
allocated to the project.
Women's Health Waiver
SB 747 by Sen. John Carona (R-Dallas) and Representative Luna
directs HHSC to seek a federal Medicaid women's health waiver to
provide family planning and preventive health services, including
cancer, diabetes, sexually transmitted diseases, and blood pressure
screenings, to women 18 years and older with incomes up to 185
percent of poverty. Enrolled women receive family planning
counseling and contraceptives. An amendment to the bill
excluded coverage for emergency contraception to make the bill
acceptable to legislators opposed to such coverage. The bill also
clarifies that the waiver will not provide funding for elective
abortions, which are prohibited under federal law. Women found to
have medical problems must be referred to appropriate physicians
and providers who do not perform or promote elective abortions nor
contract or affiliate with entities that provide such services.
Under the waiver, which has been approved in 13 other states,
Texas would gain a 90-percent federal match rate for waiver-related
services versus 60 percent for regular Medicaid services. Over five
years, the waiver is expected to save the state nearly $25 million.
A portion of the savings will be used to fund restoration of the
Medically Needy Program. TMA supported SB 747.
Payment for Advanced Practice Nurses and Physician Assistants
Budget Rider 72, Article II ─ HHSC, requires the agency to adopt
rules specifying that HHSC may not pay for any Medicaid services
provided by an associate practical nurse (APN) or physician
assistant (PA) unless the service is billed under an APNs or PAs
own provider number. Under current Medicaid rules, an APN can get
an independent provider number. However, many APN services are
currently billed "incident to" physician services using the
practice's Medicaid provider number. PAs, on the other hand,
currently are not allowed to obtain their own number and thus
always bill. From a program integrity perspective, assigning an
identification number to individual practitioners makes sense
because it allows the state to discern more easily who actually
provided the service. The rider will result in a decrease in
revenue for some practices, as APN and PA services are paid at a
lower rate for most services.
Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease
HB 1252 by Rep. Ryan Guillen (D-Rio Grande City) and Senator
Zaffirini expands Medicaid disease management to include chronic
kidney disease. The bill applies to both Medicaid HMOs
and the private vendor operating the disease management program for
traditional Medicaid. The bill requires the disease management
program to use generally recognized clinical practice guidelines
and laboratory assessments that identify chronic kidney
disease.
Payment for Services for Dually Eligible Patients
HB 1502 by Rep. John Davis (R-Houston) and Senator Nelson repeals a
provision enacted last year that prohibited the state from paying
the Medicare coinsurance or deductible if the Medicare
reimbursement rate for a service exceeded the rate allowed by
Medicaid.
Interpreter Services
HB 3235 by Rep. Carlos Uresti (D-San Antonio) and Sen. Leticia Van
de Putte (D-San Antonio) requires HHSC to provide interpreter
services to Medicaid patients who are deaf or hard of hearing, or
to their parents or guardians. Implementation is subject to
appropriation, which was not funded this biennium.
SB 376 by Sen. Frank Madla (D-San Antonio) and Rep. Bill Zedler
(R-Arlington) directs HHSC to implement a pilot Medicaid oral and
written interpreter program in collaboration with at least five
local funding entities, such as hospital districts. The bill gives
preference to hospital districts from Bexar, Dallas, El Paso,
Harris, and Tarrant counties, but allows other entities to
participate if any of the preferred districts decline. The state
funding needed to access the federal matching funds for the pilot
must be provided using local dollars.
Medicaid Buy-In Program
SB 566 by Senator Deuell and Representative Delisi directs HHSC to
implement a Medicaid buy-in program for patients with disabilities.
Federal law allows states to implement buy-in programs for patients
with disabilities earning up to 400 percent of the federal poverty
level to encourage these patients to enter or return to the
workforce, where they may not be able to obtain health insurance
coverage. Patients enrolled in the program will be required to pay
premiums and copayments.
Medicaid Rebates for Physician Administered Drugs
Rider 54, Article II, in SB 1, the state's appropriations act,
directs HHSC to amend its current information system to allow it to
collect pharmaceutical rebates on drugs administered within
physician offices. Currently, physicians bill for drugs
administered in their offices using "J-codes" instead of National
Drug Codes (NDC). J-codes are needed to identify the drug with a
specific manufacturer, and allow the state to collect a rebate. The
rider effectively means physicians will have to alter the way they
code and bill for these services. There is not a field on the
current claim forms for physicians to use NDC. TMA opposed the
provision, and HHSC raised concerns about its ability to implement
it. SB 1 reduced appropriations to the Medicaid vendor drug program
by $4 million in anticipation of implementing the initiative.
Medicaid Fraud Reduction
SB 563 by Senator Janek and Representative Delisi requires HHSC to
expand the current finger imaging pilot in phases statewide if HHSC
determines it is cost-effective. Last session, HB 2292 required
HHSC to test the feasibility of finger imaging systems to better
identity fraud by patients, and service fraud by physicians and
providers. Several systems are being tested now in the Valley,
Dallas, Austin, and Houston. HHSC must also adopt policies and
procedures relating to the program, including lost identification
cards, using finger images of children, parents/guardians, or
recipients who may havedifficulty using a finger imaging device,
such as the elderly and patients with disabilities. TMA serves on
the oversight committee for the finger imaging pilot, and will
closely monitor any program expansion.
Medicaid Provider Audits
SB 630 by Senator Van de Putte and Rep. Yvonne Gonzalez Toureilles
(D-Alice) directs HHSC to adopt rules governing the audit of
Medicaid providers. "Provider" is broadly defined to include
individuals, partnerships, corporations, or any entity with a
contract or provider agreement with Medicaid.
Rules must require that an agency 1) notify a provider of
impending audit, no later than the seventh day before the audit; 2)
limit the period covered to three years; 3) accommodate the
provider's schedule to the greatest extent possible when conducting
a field audit; 4) require an entrance interview prior to beginning
a field audit; 5) provide that providers of the same type to be
audited with the same standards and parameters; 6) require an exit
interview at the conclusion of any field investigation to review
the initial findings; 7) allow the provider to correct questioned
cost information if there is no indication of intent to commit
fraud; 8) allow provider, within 10 days of audit completion, to
give documentation to clarify any found irregularities; 9) require
the agency to deliver a preliminary audit report to provider no
later than the 60th day after the audit is completed and a final
report within 180 days; and 10) establish an ad hoc peer review
panel to administer an informal process to facilitate provider
appeals/corrections.
The bill does not apply to audits conducted by the Medicaid
fraud control unit of the attorney general's office or computerized
audits using the Medicaid fraud detection system.
Children's Health Insurance Program
Perinatal Program
SB 1, the General Appropriations Act, includes a rider directing
HHSC to establish a Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
perinatal program. Under the program, now operating in eight other
states, Texas would allow a mother who is not Medicaid eligible to
enroll her unborn child in CHIP. The program would be available to
undocumented immigrants as well as legal resident immigrants. The
enrollee will be allowed 12 months' continuous coverage dating from
the time the mother enrolls in the program. The program is expected
to expand prenatal coverage to some 17,000 babies in state fiscal
year 2006, and 47,000 babies in 2007. Texas must submit a CHIP plan
amendment outlining eligibility, benefit coverage, and enrollment
policies.
Medicaid and CHIP TMA Staff Contacts:
- Hilary Dennis, Legislative Affairs, (512) 370-1370
- Rich Johnson, Medical Economics, (512) 370-1315
- Helen Kent Davis, Governmental Affairs, (512) 370-1401
Overview
|
Tax Reform
|
Scope of Practice
|
Physician Ownership
|
Inadequate Health Plan Networks
(Balanced Billing)
|
Managed Care/Insurance Reform
|
Texas State Board of Medical
Examiners Sunset and Physician Licensure
|
Agency Sunset Review
|
Corporate Practice of Medicine
|
Health Care Funding
|
Indigent Care and the
Uninsured
|
Workers' Compensation
|
Professional Liability Reform
|
Medical Education/Workforce
|
Child Health, Safety, and
Nutrition/Fitness
|
Public Health
|
Border Health
|
Rural Health
|
Mental Health
|
Trauma/EMS
|
Prescription Drugs
|
Medical Science
|
Long-Term Care
|
Abortion
|
Transplantation/Organ Donation
|
Table of Contents