Blogged Arteries

Opinion and Commentary from TMA

Texas Neighborhoods Worlds Apart in Life Expectancy

(Public Health) Permanent link


Sometimes, statistics make you wonder – especially when they don’t add up. 

The Houston-based Episcopal Health Foundation last week issued a report comparing the life expectancy at birth of someone born in each of Texas’ 4,709 census tracts. The data came from the U.S. Small-Area Life Expectancy Estimates Project, which is run by the National Center for Health Statistics. 

“Drive 15 minutes through the biggest counties in Texas and you can go from a neighborhood where people usually live more than 85 years to another where the average person dies before he or she is 65,” Elena Marks, president and CEO of the Episcopal Health Foundation, said in announcing the report. “These numbers should spark important conversations across the state on how we can all take action to address the non-medical, root causes of these dramatic differences in health.” 

Given the growing recognition of the importance of social determinants of health, I thought I’d dive into the report to find some good examples to share with you. I didn’t realize how deep that dive would become. 

After finding, creating, downloading, unzipping, and sorting dozens of Census Bureau files, I’m still scratching my head. Maybe, in general, the levels of poverty, educational attainment, and minority population are good indicators for life expectancy in Texas neighborhoods. But at the extremes? Not so much. 

I started here in Austin, with Travis County, since a map of the neighborhoods here makes some intuitive sense to me. To my surprise, among the county’s 217 census tracts, the one where residents can expect to live the longest is right next to the one with the lowest life expectancy. They’re both south and west of Austin, in and around the community of Oak Hill. 

Astoundingly, there’s a 20.3-year difference in expected length of life between these two areas. The life expectency for children born in census tract 19.15 is just 68.6 years. Just to the west, in census tract 19.08, it’s 88.9 years. Wow! 

I know South Austin pretty well. I’ve lived the past 30 years or so within 5 to 10 miles of both of these neighborhoods. I would have guessed that 19.15 is a little bit worse off than 19.08, but not by much, and these two areas are far from the best or worst – socioeconomically – in Travis County. Right? 

Answering that question required me to spend some time with the U.S. Census Bureau’s American FactFinder project and the searchable data it provides from the 2017 American Community Survey. Once you figure out how to ask for what you want, FactFinder is really quite amazing. 

Here’s what I found about those two Travis County census tracts:

  • In 19.08, where folks can expect to live 88.9 years, the median household income is $110,833, 86% of the population is white, 89.4% have health insurance, and 60.1% have a high school diploma or some college education.
  • In 19.15, where babies can expect to live to be just 68.6 years old, the median household income is $64,599, 81% of the population is white, 78.3% have health insurance, and 63.6% have a high school diploma or some college. 

So, OK, the 19.08 population is generally in better shape than the people in 19.15 – except for education levels. But 26 of Travis County’s census tracts have higher median household income than in 19.08, and 99 tracts have lower income than in 19.15. Those trends hold for the other key variables: one tract is in the top decile or quartile, and the other is in the bottom group. But both are far from the extreme ends. 

So how do these two areas compare to the other 4,707 census tracts in Texas? When it came to life expectancy, they were in the top and bottom 1%, but they were again quite ordinary when I looked at the social determinants of health that supposedly drive length of life. 

More travels through the Census Bureau rabbit holes led me to these rather confounding findings:

  • The neighborhood where babies can expect to live the longest – 89.7 years – is right on the border with Mexico, in Hidalgo County, in the middle of the city of Weslaco.
  • We know that the Rio Grande Valley in general, and Hidalgo County in particular, are some of the poorest places in the country. By those standards, Weslaco is maybe a bit better off. The median annual household income in the neighborhood with the longest life expectancy is $37,257; for the county as a whole, it’s about $400 less. But for all of Texas, median household income in 2017 was more than double that: $70,136.
  • If you sort all of the state’s census tracts by life expectancy from highest to lowest, Hidalgo County again stands out – at the high end. Five of the 25 Texas tracts where babies born live the longest are in impoverished Hidalgo County. Only Harris County, home to Houston, has as many, and that’s likely a statistical anomaly driven by Harris County’s immense size and diversity.
  • At the other end, the lowest life expectancy in Texas falls to babies born in census tract 102, which is smack-dab in the middle of Wichita Falls. That’s a rather poor neighborhood (median household income is $19,406), but certainly not the poorest in the state. In fact, household income is lower in 51 other census tracts.
  • By the way, the poorest census tract in the entire state? It’s nearly across the street from where I’m sitting now and encompasses The University of Texas at Austin campus. The Census Bureau says median household income there is just $8,975 a year. And the life expectancy for a baby born in the shadow of the UT Tower? Not listed. 

If you’ve made it this far with me, I owe you some concluding remarks. 

First, the Census Bureau has amazingly detailed amounts of data and statistics about Americans, broken down into some of the tiniest slices, and it’s really pretty easy to navigate. 

Second, statistical analysis of population groups may be well suited to looking at data about groups of groups – e.g., how do income or educational level compare with life expectency for each 10% slice of the state’s census tracts? Looking at the individual neighborhoods at the extreme ends of this list leads you to … well, to not much at all other than a handful of large Census Bureau spreadsheets. 

Finally, if you’re going to put a statistical report through a does-this-make-sense test, start with some examples that mesh with your personal experience and intuitive knowledge. (If life expectancy in Travis County had shown up as lowest in parts of East Austin and highest in Northwest Hills – which is what I would have expected – I probably would have stopped right there. And maybe you wish I had.)

An Insurance Company Auditor Tried to Destroy My Career

(Under Pressure) Permanent link


It’s no secret that in today’s health care market, insurance companies are calling the shots. As a pediatrician in private practice for almost two decades, I’ve seen insurance companies transform into perhaps the single most powerful player in today’s health care landscape – final arbiters whose decisions about which procedures or medications to authorize effectively end up determining the course of patient care.

Niran_Al-AgbaDecisions made by insurers, such as MassHealth, have arguably killed patients. But it was only when I got caught in the crosshairs of an insurance company auditor with a bone to pick that I fully appreciated their power to also destroy physicians’ careers.

My nightmare began around two years ago, when my late father, also a physician with whom I was in practice, and I opened our Silverdale clinic on a Saturday. It was the start of flu season, and we’d just received 100 doses of that year’s flu shot. Anxiety about the flu was running high following the death of a local girl from a particularly virulent strain of the virus a year before, and parents were eager to get their kids immunized as soon as possible.

Under Washington law, adults don’t even need to see their doctors to get flu shots. They can get them at Walgreens, directly from pharmacists. But because children under 9 are more susceptible to rare but life-threatening allergic reactions, they must be immunized by a physician. This meant that, for convenience sake, parents often scheduled their kids’ annual checkup on flu shot day, thus allowing them to condense much of their routine care into a single visit.

That particular Saturday went off without a hitch, with my father and I seeing and immunizing around 60 patients between the two of us over a 12-hour day.

Three months later, a representative from the insurance company requested to see some of the patient charts from that flu clinic as part of an audit. Aimed at rooting out insurance fraud by cross-checking doctors’ records, these audits have become a routine fixture in medical practices today. To incentivize their auditors to ferret out the greatest possible number of irregularities, and thus boost the corporate bottom line, auditors work on commission, being paid a percentage of the funds they recover.

The auditor in charge of my case failed to turn up any irregularities in our documentation. But, still, she issued a stern admonition to my father and me, ordering us not to open our clinic on Saturdays to administer flu shots.

This struck me as an outrageous restriction, considering our clinic is a private entity where we set our own hours and schedule accordingly, and so I called the auditor. But instead of backing down, she ratcheted up her rhetoric, saying she was also forbidding me from examining my patients before immunizing them; clearly a bid to save her employer even more money. I was shocked. Her directive amounted to practicing medicine without a medical license — which is, of course, illegal in the state of Washington and many other states across the nation.

I shot back that immunizing infants and small children is a serious undertaking, requiring proper caution and care, informed her there was no way I would be complying with her mandate. Following this brief exchange, she took it upon herself to report me to the Medical Quality Assurance Board, the government-backed body charged with shielding the public from unqualified or unfit doctors. The accusation levied against me? Not following an insurance company mandate, which, in her opinion, amounted to unprofessional conduct.

It didn’t matter that the charges against me were ludicrous. The potential consequences were only too real, and potentially catastrophic. Had the State Medical Board decided against me, I could have lost my license. I hired a lawyer, sinking more than $8,000 into legal fees. I was cleared by a unanimous committee vote. But other physicians facing similar situations may not be as lucky.

The 18 months of excruciating stress that followed my altercation with the auditor made it patently clear that insurance companies wield far too much power. Bureaucrats are making life-and-death medical decisions without a single minute of medical training, and their auditors are terrorizing physicians by coercing state medical boards to act as their henchman. Unfettered by any consequences for enforcing policies that fly in the face of rules protecting patient safety, insurance companies will continue to harm doctors and patients alike if no one can stop them.

Niran S. Al-Agba is a pediatrician in Sliverdale, Wash., who blogs at MommyDoc

Retiring the R-Word: The Right Thing to Do

(Public Health) Permanent link


Quiz time. Which of the following words or phrases are now officially in the American Medical Association’s “not-preferred” category? (Apologies ahead of time if this Type-K question elicits stormy med school flashbacks among physicians of a certain age.) 

  1. Retarded
  2. Junkie
  3. Aid in Dying
  4. Schizophrenics 
  1. A only
  2. both A and C
  3. both B and D
  4. A, B, and C
  5. All of the Above 

The correct answer, obvious to those of you who know the difference between “person-first language” and “person-centered language” is No. 4. The AMA House of Delegates last month adopted policy that would put the first three phrases on the verboten list for physicians. When it comes to “schizophrenics” – as opposed to “people with schizophrenia” – the answer is, it depends. Typical Type K question, eh? 

Kudos to the delegates for recognizing that words, especially in the mouths and pens of powerful people like physicians, really do matter. 

Good words, the right words, spoken and written, inspire, inform, enlighten, uplift. The wrong words confuse, hurt, intimidate, discourage. 

Take “mentally retarded.” Clinically, it may be an accurate but overly broad term to describe a person with an intellectual disability. That’s yesterday. The R-word is toast. Parents should no longer have to hear a doctor say, “Your child is mentally retarded.” 

Some argue that opposition to that phrase is just part of parental delusion over the intellectual shortcomings of their son or daughter. That may be some of it. But when a word becomes a generic putdown and a nasty schoolyard taunt, it’s time to retire it from a physician’s lexicon. 

I’m proud of the Texas Medical Association’s Medical Student Section, who got the TMA House of Delegates to recommend that physicians use the term “intellectual disability” instead of “mental retardation” in clinical settings. Then they worked with the Texas Delegation to the AMA to win approval on a national scale. 

Briefly, on some of the other word-choice decisions the AMA house made:

  • Stigmatizing terminology such as “abuse” and “junkie” in the language of addiction, the delegates agreed, interferes with good patient care and puts extra potholes in the road to recovery. U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams, MD, speaking at the AMA meeting, said Americans should be “wrapping our arms around” people with substance use problems, not demeaning them.
  • Supporters of “aid in dying” lost out as part of a decision, finally, that upholds AMA’s ethical guidelines against physician-assisted suicide. “Despite its negative connotations, the term ‘physician assisted suicide’ describes the practice with the greatest precision,” the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs wrote. “Most importantly, it clearly distinguishes the practice from euthanasia. The terms ‘aid in dying” or ‘death with dignity’ could be used to describe either euthanasia or palliative/hospice care at the end of life, and this degree of ambiguity is unacceptable for providing ethical guidance.”
  • The delegates also put the kibosh on such titles as “nurse anesthesiologist” and “podiatric physician.” That’s an important tool in our fight against scope-of-practice creep. And, of course, a physician is not a provider. 

Finally, there’s the question of labeling people by their disease or disability. I’m hoping “the gall bladder in room 418” is something you no longer hear in a hospital ward. The concept of person-first language has been around since the early ’80s. By saying, “Mrs. Smith is a person with diabetes” rather than “… is a diabetic,” you acknowledge that there’s more to her than that particular diagnosis. She’s also a carpenter and a mom and a soccer coach, and maybe even schizophrenic. Person-first language, which the AMA uses and is part of TMA’s official style guide, also does away with phrases like “cancer victim” and “wheelchair bound.” 

The problem is, some groups of people with disabilities – like the deaf – and some individuals, don’t like person-first language when it refers to them. They identify with their condition and want that word to come first. And so, we’ve come to person-centered language, which “focuses on each person’s individual preferences rather than using generalizing terms for a group when referring to a disease state or disability.” That’s the approach the AMA house adopted in June. 

So back to the quiz. “The schizophrenics” might be a phrase you avoid. Or not.

Photo: Taro Taylor

With a Grain of Salt

(Public Health) Permanent link


Salt, sodium chloride, NaCl, is about 40% sodium and 60% chloride. It is ubiquitous and found in many different food items. It flavors food and is used as a binder and stabilizer. Salt has endured as an important part of our culture, and many different salt variants are available to meet our needs. 

The use of salt is now universal. Salt is thought to have entered the human diet about 5,000 years ago. Ancient Chinese texts described more than 40 types of salt about 4,700 years ago (Peng-Tzao-Kan-Mu, pharmacology). It is a food preservative – as bacteria can’t thrive in the presence of a high amount of salt – that helped humans migrate longer distances. 

NishantThe word “salary” was used to describe how Roman soldiers were paid for their duties with salt (Latin salarium). In 1930, Gandhi led thousands of Indians on a 240-kilometer salt march in defiance of the British Salt Act, which is considered a maiden event in India’s independence. 

Today salt is used as a way to preserve foods to prolong foods’ shelf life. 

The average American man and woman are estimated to consume 10.4 and 7.3 grams of salt per day respectively. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services recommend no more than 5.8 grams of salt (2.3 grams of sodium) per day, with a lower target of 3.7 grams for most adults (people over 40, blacks, patients with hypertension). One gram of sodium is equivalent to 2.5 grams of salt or sodium chloride. 

It is estimated that we need about 500 milligrams of sodium daily for our vital functions. But too much sodium in the diet can lead to high blood pressure and stroke. 

A study entitled “Salt Appetite” by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nephrologist Philip Klemmer, MD, showed that when he and a colleague went on an extremely low salt diet of 10 milliequivalents per day, they noticed a weight drop of 1.4 kilograms along with a drop in blood pressure. 

Multiple articles have shown weight and blood pressure drop with lower salt intake. A paper by Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, MD, PhD, and others published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that reducing salt consumption by 3 grams per day reduced coronary heart disease in the U.S. by 60,000 to 120,000 cases per year; the number of strokes decreased 32,000 to 66,000 cases a year. 

A study published in 1975 looked at the “salt-free culture” of South America’s Yanomami tribe, who had relied on food obtained by hunting and fruits. Of all the people studied in the tribe, the mean urine sodium excretion was 1.02 milliequivalents per day, whereas the mean systolic blood pressure was <110 mm Hg across all age groups. They also had high renin aldosterone levels given their high potassium, low sodium diet. 

Salt consumption is a cultural thing, where consumption is driven by taste and our appetite for processed food. 

Most salt we consume today comes as a preservative in foods that we buy. Table salt and salt added while cooking contribute to about 10% of salt consumption. (Figure below) 


According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the top 10 salt contributors (in mg) are:

  1. Bread and rolls (80-230),
  2. Cold cuts/cured meats (1 bacon 194/1 beef jerky 443),
  3. Pizza, 1 slice (500-700),
  4. Fresh and processed poultry (300-700 mg),
  5. Soups (300-500),
  6. Sandwiches like cheeseburgers (700-1700),
  7. Cheese, 1-oz. slice (330-440),
  8. Pasta dishes like spaghetti with meat sauce (400),
  9. Meat dishes like meatloaf with tomato sauce (600-1100), and
  10. Snacks like chips, pretzels etc. (140). 

This helps me talk salt to my patients, informing them that the real salt that one needs to cut is the salt that’s in packaged and processed foods. Feel free to sprinkle that salt on your watermelon! 

Nishant Jalandhara, MD, is a clinical nephrologist practicing in the Greater Fort Worth area. His areas of interest are hypertension and chronic kidney diseases prevention and management with a special emphasis on home dialysis. He graduated from the Texas Medical Association Leadership College in May 2019.  

Photo: Lexlex

Emergency Triage, Treatment, and Transport

(Public Health) Permanent link


 Since the beginning of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in the 1960s, ambulances have operated in a “you call, we haul” process. The 1965 Social Security Act included ambulance transportation as a covered benefit, therefore, Medicare pays ambulance providers for transportation to hospital emergency departments, skilled nursing facilities, and dialysis appointments. For years, much of EMS has operated in this model. 


EMS_Blog_VithalaniReports by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA), Emergency Medical Services Agenda for the Future (1996) and EMS Agenda 2050 (2018), detail the necessity for EMS to move away from this practice and develop patient navigation pathways that include treatment in place, as well as transportation to alternative sites of care. Despite this, little has been done nationwide, other than the relatively recent development of Mobile Integrated Healthcare-Community Paramedicine. Much of this lack of movement, however, has been due to dearth of availability of funds for these types of programs.

In 2013, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Transportation released a whitepaper regarding alternative payment models for EMS systems. In it, they outlined various approaches that move away from the current standard not only of EMS payment, but also navigating patients away from emergency departments, estimating an annual savings of $560 million.

ET3 Model

On Feb. 14, 2019, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) announced a new payment initiative for EMS – the Emergency Triage, Treat and Transport (ET3) Model. This voluntary alternative payment model will allow ambulance agencies and regional 911 centers to participate in new pathways to treatment for Medicare fee-for-service patients.

Enrolled EMS agencies will be able to develop processes for treating patients in place, after being evaluated by a Medicare-qualified health care professional on scene, or via video telehealth. They also may institute pathways for patients to be transported to locations for care other than a hospital emergency department, such as an urgent care clinic, physician’s office, sobering center, etc. In both instances, EMS would be paid for services they provide.

Local governments, or their designees, that run 911 communication centers will be able to apply to develop and manage processes for medical triage of low-acuity patients. These processes would allow patients the triage and navigation prior to the dispatch of an emergency medical resource, such as an ambulance. For example, patients could be sent to their primary care physician’s office or urgent care center via taxi or ride-sharing services, ordered by the medical triage line at the communication center.

Services will be encouraged to maintain high quality of care, with an additional 5% payment available based on pre-determined quality metrics.

Moving forward

Compared with other CMS/CMMI projects, the timeline for these initiatives is fairly aggressive. CMS will release their Request for Application for ambulance providers in summer 2019, and for local government communication centers in the fall.

Many EMS organizations already have begun developing their planned processes in anticipation of application releases. In one informal poll of social media-active EMS physicians, 16 of 25 (64%) of respondents stated their EMS agency would be applying and already have begun planning to do so. Further, three others (12%) stated they were not planning on applying, with the remaining six (24%) either unsure of their plans or unclear on the details of the ET3 model. In another survey of major metropolitan EMS medical directors (the “Eagles Coalition”) who were asked about planned participation in ET3, 19 (44%) of 43 respondents said their agency is planning on applying for the ET3 program. Another 11 (26%) were “ET3-curious,” and the remaining 13 (30%) were not interested in applying at this time.

There are many more considerations to be had prior to these programs going live. Clinically, agencies must develop processes to appropriately train and credential EMS providers for this new model of health care delivery. Both CMS and individual agencies must develop and begin to measure their outcome- and process-based performance measures to ensure appropriate quality assurance of these programs as they begin.

Operationally, the biggest consideration must be whether to attempt to implement these projects solely for Medicare fee-for-service patients or for all 911 callers. For the latter to be financially feasible, EMS agencies will need to work with other payers to sign agreements mirroring that of ET3; something CMMI states is a primary goal for the model. Further, many EMS agencies do not routinely employ, or have telehealth agreements with, qualified health care professionals other than their EMS medical director, nor is there a standard infrastructure for performing or documenting telehealth visits.


The ET3 Model already has proven to be a groundbreaking leap in the right direction toward aligning EMS as a true part of the health care field. As programs begin and outcomes are measured, hopefully it will be the first steps of many.

Veer Vithalani, MD, is the interim medical director for the Emergency Physicians Advisory Board in Fort Worth, which provides medical direction and oversight to the MedStar Mobile Healthcare System; as well as an attending emergency physician & the EMS director for the JPS Health Network. He is a fellow of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the National Association of EMS Physicians.

Digital Communication Tools Can Help Address Health Care Disparities

(Public Health) Permanent link


According to the World Health Organization, “the social determinants of health are the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. These circumstances are shaped by the distribution of money, power, and resources at global, national, and local levels.” Access to health systems also influence individuals and population.

Health care disparities are seen in chronic medical conditions like heart disease, diabetes, and arthritis in lower socioeconomic populations.

Dr_LincolnRectifying health care disparities is championed by physicians, especially primary care doctors, nurses, social service providers, and other medical professionals through individual and community education and community outreach.

In fact, you do not need to have a medical education to provide outreach – it just requires that you care. There are two primary goals of health equity endorsement: social obligation and benefit to the U.S. economy. As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt said, “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have little.”

Addressing the social determinants of health requires thinking in a novel way, as well as a concerted effort of diverse people and stakeholders who have collectively different life experiences.

Some of you are probably wondering how a radiologist like me can play a role in furthering health equity. Information technology is at the heart of radiology’s daily practice, and employing technology through clinical-decision support tools like the Radiology Support, Communication, and Alignment Network (R-SCAN) is where radiology can play a significant role on the health care team.

In radiology, addressing health care disparities means putting special emphasis on reducing unnecessary tests, while generating financial savings. This aligns with one of the aims of the Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative, a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-funded program designed to empower clinicians to expand their quality improvement capacity.

R-SCAN is a free, online, informational instrument that cultivates increased communication between radiologists and referring health care providers in advanced imaging appropriateness of patients in both the outpatient and emergency settings.

This online software has an ever-expanding list of Choosing Wisely topics, with the goal of increasing quality of care by removing inappropriate imaging and by decreasing costs to health care systems.

At Baylor College of Medicine’s affiliate institution, Harris Health System, I along with several trainees collaborated with primary care physicians at a few Harris Health outpatient clinics on a low back pain and MRI lumbar spine project. We successfully reduced inappropriate MRI lumbar spine imaging in our patient population. Harris Health is a public health system that serves a population comprised of 59.4% Hispanics and 25.1% African Americans, and in which 60.1% are uninsured and 20.6% are covered by Medicaid.

The family medicine physicians at Harris Health-Baylor College of Medicine were receptive to our overture for constructive collaboration, and thus translated the project into a successful, collaborative, health equity venture. As I think back to my years of radiology training, I recall my mentor, Jacqueline A. Bello, MD, always stating that collaboration with our clinical colleagues is the key to the best outcomes for our patients, and that stays in my heart as I practice radiology today.

Christie M. Malayil Lincoln, MD, is a board certified radiologist with a certificate of added qualification in neuroradiology at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. She will graduate from the TMA Leadership College in May 2019.

Help Aging Texans Age Well

(Public Health) Permanent link


Although Texas’ overall population is among the youngest in the nation, the state also is home to one of the largest older adult populations in the U.S.

Almost 3.5 million Texans are age 65 and older, a number projected to reach 9.4 million by 2050, according to the Texas Demographic Center.

That population, and the role they play in their communities, is celebrated in May during Older Americans Month.

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission’s (HHSC’s) Aging Texas Well initiative has been promoting opportunities for older adults for more than 20 years. The initiative offers a holistic view of issues affecting older adults. This helps the state and its communities prepare for all aspects of healthy aging.

Throughout Older Americans Month, Texas Medicine Today will share information from HHSC to help older Texans live and age well and live independently.

Are you concerned a patient’s social network is shrinking, they’re not getting enough exercise, or they’re at risk of falling? Keep reading these posts to see how you can help older Texans age well.

One common problem that can affect people as they age is social isolation. Loss of social networks can occur over time due to retirement, declining health, or the passing of loved ones.

A recent study found that Medicare spends more on socially isolated older adults than those with larger networks. The study found that spending was comparable to what the program spends on beneficiaries with certain chronic conditions. Isolated older adults were more likely to have multiple chronic illnesses, difficulty performing daily tasks, and a 50% higher mortality risk than non-isolated older adults.

If you’re concerned one of your older patients might be socially isolated, consider suggesting they attend a senior center or participate in Texercise, a group exercise initiative targeted to older adults. 

Many older adults who need care receive it from their family members. Likewise, some older adults become caregivers themselves, providing care to a spouse, a child with a disability, or even grandchildren. Organizations like the Area Agencies on Aging, Aging and Disability Resource Centers, and other community-based social services can provide valuable support services for older adults, their families, and caregivers.

The Age Well Live Well campaign provides people and communities with education on available resources, services, and supports. It also helps organizations begin aging initiatives and encourages communities to proactively plan for their aging population through policy and partnerships.

To learn more, or to educate your older patients about special issues and concerns through fact sheets or brochures, contact Age Well Live Well at (800) 889-8595 or via email.