Nov. 19, 2015
Is a Texas physician subject to
out-of-state medical liability laws if his patient files a negligence lawsuit
in the patient’s home state? Which state’s medical liability law should apply — the state where the care took place, or the state where
the patient lives?
That’s
the question now
before the New Mexico Supreme Court following a
lower court ruling that New Mexico’s medical liability laws should apply to
the case of Frezza v. Montaño, a lawsuit in which a patient claims she was harmed by a
physician. Texas surgeon Eldo Frezza, MD,
performed bariatric surgery on a patient, Kimberly Montaño, in Lubbock in 2004.
Ms. Montaño lives in New Mexico. At the time of the surgery, Dr. Frezza was an
employee of the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) in
Lubbock.
If the New Mexico high court
rules against the doctor, physicians say the impact would be great. As a Texas
physician subject to New Mexico law, Dr. Frezza and other physicians wouldn’t
enjoy tort reform protections the Texas Legislature passed in 2003. The ruling
would also strip state workers of their immunity from being sued for work in
the course of their employment by the state. Dr. Frezza worked for the State of
Texas at the time of the surgery, explains Texas Medical Association’s
(TMA’s) Texas Medicine magazine. The
bariatric surgeon faces several similar suits filed in New Mexico — where the
plaintiffs live — for surgeries performed in Texas.
West
Texas physicians such as Dr. Frezza often care for New Mexico patients whose
trip across the state line for medical care is shorter than going to
Albuquerque. Doctors are closely watching the case, including members of the El
Paso County Medical Society (EPCMS), whose physicians also often care for New Mexico
patients. In a recent newspaper opinion column, Juan Escobar, MD, EPCMS’ immediate
past president, said if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court’s decision, “The
consequences will be higher liability insurance premiums, increased costs of
practicing defensive medicine, and reluctance of new physicians to relocate [here]
or stay in the area because of its proximity to New Mexico.” Dr. Escobar added,
“In turn, this will increase the cost of providing care and reduce access for
our patients in our already underserved region.”
After
her surgery, Ms. Montaño returned to Lubbock several times for Dr. Frezza to tend
to postsurgical complications she experienced. The Texas physician is the only
bariatric surgeon in the New Mexico Managed Care Plan.
Subsequently,
Ms. Montaño sued both Dr. Frezza and the managed care plan in a New Mexico
court. Ms. Montaño argued that her case should be tried under New Mexico law
because her injuries manifested themselves in New Mexico. Defendants contested the
ruling in a New Mexico Appellate Court, which ultimately agreed with Ms.
Montaño, concluding the place of the wrong is the place where the injury
manifested, not where the alleged injury occurred — at the Texas surgical
facility. The court also determined the “choice of law” favored New Mexico
since Texas’ tort laws are more restrictive, generally giving plaintiffs lesser
awards.
The
Texas Alliance for Patient Access (TAPA) submitted a legal brief to the Supreme
Court in October to stop New Mexico law from applying to Dr. Frezza’s case. TMA
signed in support of the brief, along with the New Mexico State Medical
Society, the American Medical Association, and other physician organizations
including several county medical societies.
The
court’s decision could have a chilling effect on New Mexico patients seeking
care in Texas, doctors warn. Lubbock physician Paul D. Walter, MD, said the
outcome of the case will affect roughly 40 percent of his New Mexico patients. “If
the Montaño ruling stands, I suspect a good many of my colleagues will
reconsider providing elective care to New Mexico patients in order to avoid the
increased liability risk. This is poor public policy and would be harmful to
New Mexico residents denied care by Texas physicians.”
The New Mexico Supreme Court could schedule oral
arguments by the spring of 2016. The
court could take six to 12 months to issue a decision.
TMA
is the largest state medical society in the nation, representing more than
48,000 physician and medical student members. It is located in Austin and has
110 component county medical societies around the state. TMA’s key objective
since 1853 is to improve the health of all Texans.
--30--
Contact:
Brent Annear (512) 370-1381; cell: (512)
656-7320; email: brent.annear[at]texmed[dot]org
Marcus
Cooper (512) 370-1382; cell: (512) 650-5336; email: marcus.cooper[at]texmed[dot]org
Click here to follow TMA on Twitter. Or
visit TMA on Facebook.